Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hwei Yi Lee's avatar

So, a few thoughts:

1. ChatGPT has achieved a bunch of scale, but in terms of sheer model performance, Claude has wider adoption in the tech industry, the Alpha Arena investment test is being dominated by other models (https://nof1.ai/). I think each model and / or tool is achieving something different but there are multiple killer apps out there which are likely to iterate fast and improve fast.

2. That is the reason why I feel solo vibe-coding-based entrepreneurship, especially for those of us with no computer science and no founder experience, is unlikely to be the best way into the AI-driven economy. I know I can't out-solution or out-iterate Aravind Srinivas. And I don't want to, but I want to develop enough AI literacy to speak the language, uncover truths, and be a good role model to others.

3. Humans scale together. Agree that individual knowledge premiums may go down, but there are significant biases still in the information that AI is trained upon. Leading-edge scholarship and journalism are sitting in places where training algorithms aren't going to touch. We've got to engage with AI wisely and yes, not hoard info but use judgement, stay curious, be prepared to look for insights in places that aren't easy to find, and combine voices / scale perspectives to get better results together.

Robin Good's avatar

Fascinating article Corrales. I really like your idea of Living Software, baed on our ability to encode our knowledge and expertise into AI.

I am curious to ask you, how do you see the practical development of what you suggest at point 6. "Focus on talent: Develop talent for judgment, curation, coordination, and risk—not just technical execution."

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?